

Villaescusa FRANCISCO SAID
Dear Paco,
I'll start where you end up. The next day 29 this Committee has decided to support the strike although not raised as it should be, ie before and more days of strike. We are sure that this strike the Committee will respect what you do ye; as to guarantee that you can work, is not in our hands because, you understand, we do not control people who may come from outside the Company and your right to work only be ensured by the riot police to send ZP.
As for the comments you make, I start with a big lie to say in paragraph 3 º "Cheaper dismissal," I hope that is only the result of your ignorance not something malicious. I inform you that no member shall be charged anything when you win or lose a lawsuit either by dismissal or whatever ERE. Therefore "commission" charged by the unions is 0 euros.
On the "temporary consolidation" critical that unions have never been interested in this topic. Yet you seem to support this critical time where the point 3 as rigid labor market we have. While it is true that unions also make garbage contracts, I guarantee you have nothing to do with the conditions of these workers with the rest of contract by private companies.
"Liberalization of objective dismissal" does not cease to amaze me the things you say, you only understand if you were an entrepreneur. you understand that for a modern labor organization is that the employer dismissed at any time and cheap, U.S. style, which is the strongest economy in the world but where millions live on the edge of poverty, lack of security and pensions.
On the "collective bargaining", I think your proposals are you talking about communist paradise, as you know, failed not by ideas but for the people. A, is precisely what the reform is to eventually every worker has to negotiate its own terms, and if it is difficult to achieve improvements collectively imagine individually.
On the "pension reform", I understand what you mean is to be privatized. One of the ideas of the CP and the banks and will surely end up supporting the PSOE. I certainly always support public over private.
of criticism on the management of Zapatero I will not comment because I am no fan of his, but what you can to suggest working on the day 29 is that you're accordingly.
Tellto finish if you want to terminate the union freely do it like you did when you signed up. If you think that's why we're hurting the Committee or any delegate in particular, you're wrong. Who do harm is to all workers by taking away support for the Committee always weakens in the face of the Company. Perhaps this is why so low that affiliation with the unions (not the case of our company members fortunately -85%-) means they have to go to beg money from various governments and have to pay for favors. Therefore do not know who has more blame if the unions or workers who spend less to criticize all that is free .
ADOLFO Roldan said:
Let's see, I'm not going to make her huelga.Si, would make two, 29 against the government and 30 against sindicatos.Que not misled the country, are greeting mismos.Un
PRACTICAL EXAMPLES
The document that we leave to steady, we consider it very important to understand why the 29 th Strike . It's long but very interesting and I recommend reading it. Clicking here where it says Efectos Pracitcos Reforma Laboral , se amplia y se puede imprimir.
0 comments:
Post a Comment